You may remember a report back in January regarding YouTube cleverly hiding some porn on its website. These videos were cloaked as educational, although they featured some x-rated content. Well, it’s been a couple of months now and it looks like the video sharing site has hardly changed its pornographic tendencies.
LIGHT PORN HIDDEN IN YOUTUBE MOVIE
At first glance, the YouTube movie Naked World looks like a documentary focused on the habits of New Zealand nudists. The movie is featured around a 2014 world record that shows the largest amount of naked people in the water at one time. 745 people were part of the event and as one can imagine, the video shows a lot of nudity. While not porn per say, YouTube does not give any warnings in regards to the nudity nor does it make any attempt to censor male or female private parts. The minute long movie “preview” has over 10 million views, so obviously, people seem to be enjoying the exposure.
CASE NUMBER 2: NAKED CLUB VIDEO STREAK
Naked Club’s Video Streak edition 1 is yet another example of questionable nudity found on Youtube. Described as a “short blast of reporting from the nudist world” Naked Club seems to think they are informative. If showing 14 minutes of naked men and women is your definition of informative then yeah, this video is educational as heck. Something tells me that education is not the main motivator of The Naked Club. For a website that seems to be anti-porn, Youtube sure seems to have a lot of it hidden in it’s damp and sticky corners.
FEDERAL JUDGES CRACKING DOWN ON PORNOGRAPHY
If you think that you can quietly upload porn on the Tube, be careful. Recently, a Texas federal judge threatened to sanction a channel on the popular video-sharing site for soliciting porn for submission to the channel. The accused man allegedly told his Twitter followers that he would upload their pornography to his VideoGames Channel. This would apparently violate the site’s community guidelines. Seeing as there are several examples of adult entertainment found throughout the site, perhaps someone should go over those “guidelines” again.
